Here’s 10 Reasons Why You Should Sponsor The SoEntrepreneurial Blog

See that mountain biker over there to the right?  That could be your business/company image and link for an entire month.  Monthly Sponsorship Investment -$5oo.  A quick payment through paypal will get you highlighted for 30 days straight on this blog.  Why the specific amount you say?  Here’s 10 quick reasons:

Nick needs to make blogging a sustainable practice.  He has been told he is pretty good at it and he enjoys every minute and every interview.  Please think about how you can help him and send this to any founder, entrepreneur, business owner, lawyer, dentist, investor, CFO, CEO, CPA, MBA, MD, student, grad student, mother, father, grandson, brother, sister, and baby you can think of who might be able to keep SoEntrepreneurial adding value to your life each day.

See those twitter, facebook and linkedIn buttons below.  Click em!  Send it.  Let’s do this!

I Am Thinking The Exact Same Thing Right Now

John Battelle is currently embarking on a new book, titled What We Have Wrought.  In it he is attempting to write a narrative of the perspective in 2040, a generation ahead who is looking back on the last 30 years of progress back to today.  As he describes our situation, I stumbled upon this and fully agree with him:

I believe we are in a critical moment in our civilization’s development, one where we will face a number of fateful decisions about how we interact with each other, with business, and with government. The decisions we make during this period will frame the kind of world we’ll leave to future generations. Who will control the data we create? What access will we allow citizens to the machinations of government? What kind of people will we become when every single one of us is deeply connected to a socially aware platform like Facebook? Are we building systems – in healthcare, energy, finance – that are too complicated for any of us to understand, much less control?

In short, can we handle what we are creating? Thirty or so years from now, will we be questioning ourselves – “Lord, what hath we wrought?” Or will we look upon what we hath wrought, and be pleased? I think the answer lies in exploring where we are, right now, and laying out the implications of our actions today.

A longer post from me on these thoughts will follow, but go ahead and ponder those words for a moment.

A Response To ‘Being The United States of Idiocracy’

I recently wrote an article titled Did We Just Become The United States of Idiocracy?, which was published both on this site as well as Business Insider.  It is a poignant piece, treading lightly but on a topic that should be worrisome to Americans- the private investment sector giving more attention and money to trivial products and companies while education and healthcare continue to wither on the vine.  Here is thought provoking comment from a Business Insider reader I felt would be great to share.

Interesting article. I also have marveled at the amount of talent and energy being thrown at really trivial things involving the Internet or mobile phones or other toys. I attribute this to the precarious imbalance between investors and producers. The investors have never held so much power and been so dominant in determining the economy. Yet, that is an unstable position, since it is producers that are the real source of power and activity. For example, young working people are producers – they don’t have money to invest. People on pensions are investors; they don’t produce anything but live off of the production of others. The people in the streets in the Arab countries and Greece are the producers of those countries, and the power they are fighting is the investors.

Investors add value to a capitalist economy by directing productive activity in an efficient manner. The current world imbalance consists of a very large amount of investment capital, which is remarkable already, but even more remarkable for the stupidity of that capital. Capital is managed for the good of society not by a dictator but by the risks of investment. But our Fed in its infinite corruption has decided on a new mandate that no investor should ever lose money, no matter how stupid or inappropriate their investment.

Thus the fools who lent Greece money, which is a purely absurd loan that deserves to lead to poverty for whoever approved that loan, these fools will be bailed out. This makes today’s investor class the stupidest of such that have existed in recent history. There is no possible penalty to risk; the Fed has stated a world-wide policy of Too Big To Fail which seems to include all investors and all investments in its complicated web. Thus the traditional positive contribution of the investor class has flown out the window. Rather than rational distribution of production, they now produce irrational and foolish distribution of production. There is no down-side to risk, all risk is good risk, all investors big enough always win as the Fed bails out the stock market, the sovereign debt, the big corporations that have failed such as GM.

Net result is an entire generation creates silly toys for mobile phones or new Facebook games rather than productive work that could be of benefit to the general public or mankind. The interesting byplay is that the producers of the world are going to war with the bloated investment system, and that is World War III. It is not between countries, but between the controllers and the controlled.

The world of VC and startup is sort of a place where producers are lulled into collaborating with the world’s enemy, or at least their own natural enemy. VC is evil. It isn’t shades of gray. There isn’t a compromise. There isn’t a way you can enjoy being productive and the fruits of your labor and still get along with an investment system gone pyscho. That’s what this generation will need to work out. There is no compromise with evil, one must oppose it.

Here is Why Your Passion is Always A Blessing

This post is built off of Bob Crimmons’ recent post Entrepreneurial Passion: A blessing or a Curse.  In one part I agree with Bob and in another I find disagreement and will offer a slightly varying perspective.  Let’s call it taking a different path to a similar conclusion and in doing so encouraging any entrepreneur that yes, they should pursue their passion to the fullest extent.

I agree with Bob in his general message – you must validate the idea you have become passionate about.  As he eludes, it is natural for an entrepreneur be overcome with the passion for “scratching their own itch”, working long hours to get something out into the market only to launch and then realize their execution is all wrong.  The way around this (and what I believe Bob was encouraging any entrepreneur to do) is to do massive market testing and validation prior to any time invested in production.  How do you do this?

Observe – Go into your target market’s environment and observe them interacting around where your product would fit.

Investigate – Ask them open ended questions regarding their thoughts on X, Y, Z products and features.

Float The Idea – Spend $25 on a google ad promoting your product with the link leading to a landing page, observe the click response.

Test and Research – Do massive business model research prior to launching a product, especially if you are developing a “social app”.

These are just a few actions that fall within due diligence and business validity testing and they should be done prior to any product work.  So yes, I agree with Bob when he cautions entrepreneurs in blindly pursuing their passions.

I should know, I was the guy Bob was talking about the first attempt at my start up, Loyaltize.  I was extremely passionate about building a business which not only was to be a web 2.0 darling but would also rewrite the books for the new social media marketing era.  Our bright idea was to integrate local business marketing and the support of local non-profits, such as youth soccer teams.  Local business created offers and coupons with donations tied into them, so when someone redeemed the offer a donation would go from the local business to the local soccer club.  Everyone wins right!  We were so passionate about this idea we spent more than a year to build our site (remember, I was living a double life so things take double the amount of time you think they should) and finally launched in our test market.

BAM…. fell right on the ground.   We scraped it forward for about six months but basically realized our execution around a few main features was flawed.  Would we have saved the year if we did proper user testing and validation?  I am not sure but we would have learned a few key lessons and we probably would be still growing right now had we validated properly.  I learned you need to do major validation, testing, and “pivoting” around your initial assumptions to get the proper fit.

-I am now going to talk strongly here and although I have never met Bob, I fully respect him-

What struck a cord when I read Bob’s post is I am that guy – incredibly passionate, focused, head down working to build out a new platform to take over the world.  It struck me quite deep because after working so hard on something you start to wonder if you are doing the right thing and really cut out to be an entrepreneur if things aren’t coming together.  It struck me because, as they say, “truth hurts”.

Passion definitely can work against you, and if you are an entrepreneur you are probably nodding your head with me.

But I would caution Bob on cautioning entrepreneurs to be wary of their passions.  It has the potential to send the wrong message to young aspiring entrepreneurs; because it’s not what you say, it’s what they hear.  They will hear messages such as “don’t follow your passion, follow a proven business model” and “Your passions are not valid businesses”.

Following a proven business model does not inspire innovative new ideas, it does not create new markets nor does it spawn new industries.   Encouraging entrepreneurs to follow proven business models creates hundreds of daily deal sites.  We don’t need more competition, we need more innovation.

I would not be writing for you today had I taken Bob’s advice.  There is a high probability that if I went to a mentor such as Bob and they cautioned me on pursuing my passions, I might be on a different path.  Keeping aligned with my passion is what helped me gather enough knowledge and courage to make the leap and put me in the position I am in today.  I am so grateful someone I respected didn’t pull me aside and say “ya know Nick, this Loyaltize thing just does seem like it’s panning out for you.  Are you sure you should pursue this passion?”

I think Bob’s message takes the wrong angle on a good point.  Rather than telling entrepreneurs to be wary of things they are passionate about, I think a better angle on this issue would be to encourage entrepreneurs to harness their passions for everything they have.  Understand you have been tapped by something (someone) and dive deep into the problem area you are looking to bring a solution to.  Indeed entrepreneurs need every ounce of their passion to get where they want to go.

Jack Dorsey was obsessed with how cabs moved and communicated about the city.  He was so passionate about the idea of communication networks he sat on the idea for twitter for something like 6 years.  He couldn’t shake it and decided to build it even though it seemed crazy and didn’t make sense.  We are lucky to have twitter today to help us connect with people around the globe (@jnickhughes if you want to connect with me)

Dennis Crowley was seemingly obsessed with location aware technologies, so he built Dodgeball.  He ended up selling it to Google quite quickly, which some saw as a success, but they subsequently shut it down.  This really bothered him.  Because he was so passionate about this concept he build another application, Foursquare, with the knowledge and validations they learned from Dodgeball.  Foursquare just crossed the 10 million user mark in a little over 2 years and is paving the way in geolocation applications.

I am not being facetious here, I am being totally serious.  I guarantee Jack, Dennis, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates or any other successful entrepreneur followed their passion.  The next “Jack” or “Dennis” is probably reading this right now.  They are gripped by something in the world, so gripped they want to build a product and business around it.  I say follow it.  Build it.  Test it.  Work it.  Rework it.  Test it again.  Stay on it.  Just don’t give up, the right thing will come together.

Call me crazy and laugh to yourself if you want, but I wholeheartedly believe this: The only difference between you and Jack Dorsey is… you just haven’t figured out the combination yet.  That is it.

In fact, I am of the camp we need more entrepreneurs who think bigger.  I agree with Jason Freedman of FlightCaster.

Jason wrote a post recently about a recent trip he took to visit some friends, Henderson and Rebecca who live in Mississippi.  He was shocked at what he felt as he was leaving them:

I’m glad we’ve moved past throwing sheep at each other on Facebook.  I’m glad we’ve moved past acquiring users by downloading someone’s contact list and spamming their friends.  The startup ecosystem is much healthier than it was in 2008.  But still, I’m concerned.  As a fellow geek and early adopter, I’m psyched for one of the photo-sharing concepts to really take off.  I think it’ll be sweet to instantly share pictures with my friends in cool new ways.  But I know it’s not a huge problem for Henderson and Rebecca.  It’s just not an issue that affects them.  I’m concerned about how many of us are working on problems that just don’t matter all that much to the rest of the world.

Look, it requires a lot of passion to change the world.  I mean, to really impact Henderson and Rebecca you are going to need to harness all your passion and give it everything you got.  Just remember to test and validate along the way.

Image courtesy of Flickr user Horia Varlan

Here’s My Call For The Occassional Unplug

Our world has changed quite a bit in the last 10 years; always connected phones, tweets, Facebook status updates, digital maps for when we get lost, free music 24 hours a day streamed through our mobile phone.  Sometimes it takes unplugging and detaching from our devices for a few days to realize how far we have progressed.

I am connected and on from the moment I open my eyes each day until the minute I fall asleep.  Every day I read and write on this laptop.  Every day I listen to music through my “phone” (imagine saying that sentence 10 or 20 years ago).  I also us my phone for messaging friends, browse online and shop and pay for things.  Using technology has become an integral part of my life, as I assume it has in yours.

I recently took a weekend backpacking trip with a few good friends in the mountains of Washington State (about 2 hours east of Seattle).  It was awesome.  Getting out in nature sans any electronics and internet connected device is so rare today I think most don’t even realize how great it is when you get out into the country for a short time.  Nature has now become the exception, not the rule.  This though started to brew this last weekend.  Below are a few thoughts I picked up as we trekked through the mountains.

We use our tech devices for EVERYTHING

Looking for directions, location information, talking, messaging, searching for information, taking pictures, sharing pictures, planning ahead, making a list, reading an article, updating on news, killing time when we are bored, and many more…  Wow, it doesn’t become so obvious until you don’t have your internet connected device on you – we are a constantly connected society that fully depends on the internet to function.  We actually can live and function without them.

Life is more peaceful without constant interruption

In fact, with my phone disconnected and turned off, I did not have distraction or interruption to take me away from the moment.  Think about it for a second, the mere fact that you have an informational device on you capable of so many different things is in itself a distraction.  You can grab it anytime to check and see if someone has text or called you.  You can bring up a little game you have been playing to kill 5 minutes while you wait for someone.

These little mental”recesses” take you away from the moment you are in currently, and I would argue this is one of the reasons more people are stressed out, short fused and possibly feeling like they are going crazy.  The brain has no time to take in the moment, uninterrupted.  Being in the wilderness even for 72 hours helped me get some of this peacefulness back.

Your body needs to be physically challenged

With technology advancing so rapidly, it seems we continue to develop applications that do for us what we used to do physically.  This is not the best situation for us, as a species.   No one will argue we are getting larger as a society, as well as less healthy and more lazy.  Getting out on the trail, putting 40 pounds on your back, hiking up a mountain, burning some calories in the process all help you maintain proper physical fitness.  It felt great.  I will never lose my physical ability to run, hike, swim and play as children do.  I believe that is what life is all about.

Sometimes we need to unplug and bring ourselves back to how life was meant to be experienced – naturally.

I Just Asked My Friend About the Future of The Web, and Here is What They Said

Social Search Series: This summer I am embarking on a journey through on the emerging web of Social Search.  Traditionally known as the Questions & Answers industry, this category is currently being transformed by social and mobile technologies.  No more asking a site questions and finding old answers.  I believe the future of the web is ingrained in the dynamic interdependence of social and informational networks.  This is part I of the series.

Traditional Question & Answer sites are old and antiquated.  You know the drill – go to a specific website, type a question into a search bar and a variety of indexed answers come back to you.  The answers vary in context, quality and relevancy.  This was fine in 2002 when the web was less mature, but the reality is with advancements in web technologies it simply does not work today.  The problem is these sites typically:

  • Don’t know your location

  • Don’t know who are your friends

  • Don’t understand the context of your query

  • Are typically of low quality and relevance

Answers tend to be more relevant and helpful when they include this information.  When the system lacks these inputs, the quality of answers remains very low and you are left with an inadequate solution .  In fact, so low in quality you might as well just pick up your phone and call a friend.

Enter a new category of applications emerging on the web.  Social search applications implicitly take into consideration your social network, your location, your demographics, previous search history and other key data sets to help provide you with the best answer possible at that time.  I will not refer to the Questions and Answers space anymore, since I think asking a question and waiting for an answer is quite limiting and the entire concept is antiquated.  I believe we are on the cusp of a new internet category where users leverage their social/local sphere to quickly find relevant information.  I am calling this space the “Social Search” category.  Note that currently I am not including Facebook – the largest social networking site – in this category.  This is a study of startups who are strictly focused on social searching technologies.

This space is heating up and I am starting to read more about emerging companies working to build out the next social/local search platform.  Traditional Q&A sites are starting to see the writing on the wall, with Answers.com just recently massively laying off employees and replacing their CEO and CTO.  In fact, I wrote about a few local Q&A startups a while back noting this space is a game changer on the web.

When evaluating this new space, Four categories/quadrants emerge to separate the players in social search.  I have diagrammed them based on their relation to the four categories.  (If you don’t see an application that might fit on here, please reach out to me)

Location Relevance

Locating a user when a query is submitted is fundamental to providing the BEST answer possible.  According to Bing, over 50% mobile device originated search queries are about a specific place.  Think about how often you need an answer and how often you quickly use your mobile device to find it.  Exactly.  Mobile search will define the next wave of the web.

LOCQL

LOCQL is a Seattle startup some refer to as “Foursquare Meets Quora”.  These guys smartly put together two basic premises; 1) everybody knows a little bit about something and 2) location specific information always make something more valuable.  Marry those together, involve some game mechanics and you have a living, breathing repository of location relevant information based upon where you currently find yourself.  They are still in beta but anyone can use the LOCQL application.

Others include:

CrowdBeacon

Loqly

Gootip

Hipster

Travellr

LocalUncle

Local Mind

Location Agnostic

Some social search applications do not integrate location technologies into their functionality.  These applications more or less originate around specific topics and knowledge bases, not so much around a specific location.   Although these applications are location agnostic, they still can be relevant to certain users and possibly large search companies.

Aardvark

Aardvark is a way to get quick, quality answers to questions from your extended social network. You can ask questions via an instant message buddy or email. The questions are then farmed out to your contacts (and their contacts) based on what they say they have knowledge of. If you ask taste related questions about music, books, movies, restaurants, etc., they’ll ask people who tend to show similar tastes as you in their profile.

Others include:

Formspring

StackOverflow

Quora

Yahoo Answers

Long Term Value

It is important to create a  repository of information so users have something to search, and if done correctly this can be a great competitive advantage – the largest collection of information generally provides the best and most accurate information to a user.  Most questions have a narrow answer and this information generally does not change much over time.

Quora

Quora, founded by former Facebook employees, is a continually improving collection of questions and answers created, edited, and organized by everyone who uses it.   They aim to build THE go to application for wisdom and knowledge.  The cool thing about Quora is you can follow well known people as they continue to add their knowledge to the site. Quora seems to be the emerging leader of these newly minted social Q&A sites.  Thus far they have maintained their focus on the relatively smaller web tech community of Silicon Valley.

Others include:

CrowdBeacon

Loqly

Gootip

Hipster

Travellr

LOCQL

LocalUncle

StackOverflow

Yahoo Answers

Real – Time Answers

Instant interaction technology (real time) has transformed the web from a static information repository to a live, interactive medium.  This single change gave birth to what we know today as the social web, including Facebook, Twitter and many other social interactive platforms.  Search technology is catching up as well, and when infused with social interaction things could get very interesting.  Understandably, this category is nascent.

LocalMind

Localmind allows you to send a question to any place in the world, and get an answer from someone at that location in real-time.  They connect you, temporarily and anonymously, to someone at the location you are interested in, allowing you to ask any question you want, and get an answer in real-time. You can find out how crowded it is at a bar, how long the line is at a club, or how many tables are open at the restaurant.

Others include:

Ask Around (Ask.com)

Aardvark

Formspring

Look for my next post as I investigate: what’s the point of Q&A anyway?  Why am I now calling it Social Search?

How to Connect in the Twenty First Century

Connect.  What do you think of when you hear that word?  I think most people think Facebook Friending, Following on Twitter or emailing a contact.  “Hey, let’s connect.”

Our definition of connecting has changed a lot in the last decade.  Think about it for a second; back in the year 2001, we didn’t have Facebook, Twitter, Gmail, or smart phones.  In fact, if I remember correctly I didn’t get my first cell phone until 2002 or 2003.  Before the turn of the century, we actually spoke or even looked at the person we were connecting with.  No so today.

Why is this important?  Understanding how to connect with people is one of the foundations to success – as a person first, and a professional second.  If you cannot connect with another person on a level where trust is established, you will find it hard to make inroads in your life.  I believe trust is found through the eyes (for proof, even looking at those eyes above feels a little crazy).

I have had the fortune to meet a lot of new people recently, and I make it a point to set a time to meet these people in person, shake their hand, sit across the table from them and look them in the eye.  Why?  Because this creates a trust bond.  Even after 30 minutes of talking, once they know you are genuine, a bond has been created and a great things can now happen from that interaction.  Great things like further introduction into a tighter social/professional circle and connections to other like-minded people you otherwise wouldn’t end up meeting.

That is what’s happening to me right now, and it’s great.  I can’t wait to repay all the favors people are doing for me.

Image courtesy of Flickr user Antropsicosociopatologico

Another Lesson Learned: See The Opening

I woke up yesterday to a pretty cool email waiting in my inbox with the words:

“We would like you to come in and interview Giant Thinkwell and Sir Mix-A-Lot today”

This doesn’t just happen to anybody, and it certainly doesn’t happen to someone that waits for opportunities to fall in their lap.  Successful entrepreneurs MAKE things happen.  And to be brutally honest, I pretty much made this happen (acknowledgment: with help from others to connect the dots).  How?  It all started 3 months ago.

  1. I connected with a founder of a recently launched startup about 3 months ago
  2. We stayed in contact via email, sometimes not hearing from him for months at a time
  3. I started writing on this blog
  4. I started shooting out my posts to larger publications around the country
  5. BusinessInsider.com like my writing, published a few posts and offered me to become a contributor
  6. I finally met up with the founder a few weeks ago and chatted about my latest happenings (quitting job, blogging, looking for connections)
  7. He connected me into a local startup communications list last week
  8. Giant Thinkwell, a local startup, announced they were releasing the Mix-n-Match app on the list
  9. They also requested help and asked if people could spread via social networks
  10. I reached out and simply commented “I could do a post on BusinessInsider.com if they wanted”
  11. I recieved the email in the morning and that afternoon I was sitting across the table having a conversation with “Mix”

Successful people jump at opportunities and follow through on them.  You cannot wait around for someone to find you and give you exactly what you have been looking for.  You must go make it happen.  Like a running back in football, when you see an opening, you must go for it.  Sometimes that little opening will make all the difference in your life.

Image courtesy of Flickr user Monicas Dad

An Exclusive Interview with Sir-Mix-A-Lot Baby!

Giant Thinkwell, a social game studio based in Seattle launched a new Facebook game today called Mix-N-Match that features Grammy Award-winning hip hop icon, Sir Mix-A-Lot.  Mix n Match brings you and your friends along side Sir Mix-A-Lot to hang out, learn more about the entertainer, win stuff and have a good time.

I had the opportunity to sit down with Sir Mix-A-Lot and Giant Thinkwell CEO Adam Tratt today for a little chat about the new project as well as the recent changes in the entertainment industry.  When you sit with Mix, you get the feeling this man knows what’s going on.  He is curious, quick witted as well as forward thinking.  You also get the feeling he is not done yet.  Here is an excerpt of our interview.

What attracted you to Giant Thinkwell?

These guys are geniuses.  From my perspective, a guy who came along in an era where you were distant from your fans, not by design, that is just how it was.  It was all systematic.  They produced the record, they distributed the record, they promoted the record, you wait till you get the call.  The way you sell records now is totally different.  These Giant Thinkwell guys are rock stars.  They are the mega pimps of this era, and they understand it really is about connecting with fans.  They get it!

What did you do back then in the day?

It was really the label.  They had a team of people who scripted how you were going to do things.  They did everything.  As an artist you were very removed from it all.  Most guys have just pulled back.  My manager has been talking about this stuff for a long time.  And now today, your fans know everything, like what time you take your dumps in the morning to what kind of underwear you are wearing, ya know?

Adam, is this Giant Thinkwell’s first app?

No, but it is our second.  So our story is the company was born at Start-up weekend.  In the beginning of social games it was the Wild West, and  Zynga was doing whatever they wanted on Facebook.  Now, everyone else is now clamoring for a piece of it.  Zynga already has their customer base of 500 million players.  What we realized is there is very little in the area of Branded Entertainment, and what is out there is really not that good.  So we thought, why don’t we take 2 things people love, social games and entertainment and put them together?

Where do you see this category of apps going?

Adam: What’s happening on the sidelines in entertainment is the whole model is changing, people aren’t buying records much any more.  It’s all changed.  Entertainers and celebrities of all kinds musicians, actors, athletes, will be interacting with their fans on line, in fact they do it already.  Social media right now is about talking AT your fans.  So we think the model is going to change.  The bar is going up. We think the way a guy like Mix announces and releases a new song will change.  And we want to be a part of it.

Mix: from an artist perspective, this is the first time in my career I can shape my brand, my personality.  They used to think “OK, this is a dumb guy who likes Big Butts and asses” (according to Mix only part of that is true) because that is how I was promoted by the record labels.  But now, I come down to meet with the Giant Thinkwell team and they don’t go, “this is what we’re doing”, they say “what should we do?”  Finally I am able to deal with my fans one-on-one on my terms with my personality.  It’s great!  I predicted the demise of the music industry back in 1999.  So today, I’m not like Lady Gaga and the way she is with her fans, but it’s on my own terms.  You are your own marketing firm now.  The gangsta element of record business is gone forever.

Do you think it’s a better time to be a musician?

Good Question.  From an old school cats point of view, no it’s not a better time cause back then we were spoiled.  But a new artist just breaking in, yes it is.  Because Music is more honest now.   You can get your stuff out into people’s hands in so many different ways.  So the cream is going to rise and the good ones will break out naturally.

You’ve seen success, what is the most important characteristic of successful people?

Mindset.  I have never met a successful person who talked about failing.  The glass is always half full.  I don’t even like being around negative talkers.  And secondly, they always figure out a way to monetize something.  You find a hole in the market, find what people don’t have enough of… and you supply it.  There is a big difference between those people who have the entrepreneurial spirit and those who are talented, but scared of themselves.  They are always sitting in the corner, shivering, wondering why they can’t make it.  Successful people jump at opportunity and take advantage of it.

What keeps you going?

Anything new.  I just started new company called True Human Interface, software to help people make music easier.  Right now we are finishing the brains of the software and we’re thinking sometime early next year we’ll have something released.  If you look at a lot of the older artists, the only ones who are still profiting are the ones trying these new things.  Our goal is to come out with a strong, serious product.  I was watching them edit True Grit, and they edited the whole thing with mouse and keyboard.  It was crazy!  We think we can have some good ideas to help make things easier.

What advice to you have for young entrepreneurs?

Make sure that you have  is unique and necessary, make sure your dream is viable.  Second, don’t be afraid to fire someone early if they are not the right fit.  You need to make sure you have the right people in the right places.  Lastly, don’t be afraid of criticism.

Image courtesy of Wikipedia.

Did We Just Become The United States of Idiocracy?

This post was originally published on BusinessInsider.com

Recently quitting my job and diving full time into entrepreneurship has allowed me time to step back and think about what is actually going on in the current tech space. It’s interesting times to say the least, but what I am about to say may not be what you expected.

A concerning trend is starting to bubble from within and I feel it is necessary to bring it to light. Reviewing the web’s latest news we see more companies going public, constant talk of Groupon’s massive growth and community destruction, Facebook tempting us (and current employees) with an inevitable IPO, Twitter’s ubiquity becoming every politicians nightmare and Google’s latest and always awkward attempt at the social web.  Seems like just another month in the frothy web market.

But take a close look at this infographic detailing Q1 investment dollars broken down into categories.  It is from an article a few weeks ago on GigaOm.  Click for a larger view.

So let me get this straight: If this information is correct, most of our capital resources and engineering talent are hard at work figuring out how to help people buy massages for 50% off?

Disclosure: my startup – Loyaltize Inc.- was initially focused on local commerce with our first version and it remains to be seen what we build out next but my mind is buzzing with new perspectives as of late. So I am also talking to myself here.

While trying to figure out what this infographic actually means let me just state the obvious – taken on the surface it tells a lot about what we value as a society.  Or what we don’t value.  Namely Health Care, Education, Security, and “all the others.”  This has massive future implications and should be a cause for worry – that is if you are American.

Social Commerce attracted 22% of all investment dollars so far in 2011. Advertising, sales and marketing took home another 14%. and social apps saw 7% of VC money. That is almost 1/2 of startup investment dollars focused on improving how we socialize and spend money! (note: take away the amount invested in the Groupon bubble and the picture changes a bit, but hyperbole is needed here to provoke some deeper thought.)  The amount of money invested in “all other areas” of technology equaled the amount invested in Groupon and the like-clones.  You have got to be kidding me.

No wonder the United States of Idiocracy America is at record levels of consumer and national debt. An old maxim comes to mind: show me where your money goes and I’ll show you what you value. I will also offer another maxim:  Show me today what you are investing in and your future I will show you.

The sad truth is we value selling products over our children’s future well being and education. We value buying stuff right now over investing in a better future. We value gluttony over governance. With this current trend in investments, these “American” values won’t be changing anytime soon. There is no fighting or arguing this statement. It’s all right there.

This whole Groupon thing has gotten out of control. We are falling farther behind the world in education, yet we seem to excel in creating new ways to spend money quicker and eat cupcakes faster. The biggest and most anticipated IPO this year is going to be a site where mass consumers can purchase things at mass discounts? Sometimes I think I am hallucinating that Groupon is the major story of innovation on the web in 2011.

Is this the best we can do Silicon Valley? Chicago? New York or Seattle? Or is this just what investors think will make them the fastest dollar? That is one part ridiculous and another part sad.

This baffles me: Why are the largest issues of the past 4 years and the focus of the current political landscape – things that are paramount to the future of our country – receiving almost no private investment attention?

What about using some brain power and engineering talent to rework the healthcare system, a system which is in more dire straights than our shopping experiences? How about transforming education so children understand the world is full of information and it’s all right at their finger tips? They just need the access, be taught how to use and deploy it to their advantage all the while learning how to critically think. And if I was sitting across from the table from you and asked what is more important: 1) buying something from your mobile phone or 2) your personal security, I think most of you would admittedly choose the latter.

Hundreds, maybe thousands of companies have determined the best use of their time and intelligence is to copy Groupon and put out another daily deals site. Numerous talented engineers are inventing new ways for us to share pictures from our iPhone and scores of startups have been working on new methods of messaging groups of people.

Although all those ideas are interesting in their own way, it is the equivalent of Barry Bonds stepping up to the plate and bunting. Wha? Yeah, I ask myself the same question every day as I read another $5 million was just invested in a Series A round for another picture sharing/messaging iPhone application.

You guys are the best of the best… remember?

The reason I wrote in-depth about technology cycles was because it became clear to me the web will very quickly infiltrate every part of our life.  I cannot wait till the internet of things starts to power everything we use, from our toothbrushes (transmit data to help us maintain our oral health) to our shoes (real time data about how many steps we have taken, informing us when we need new shoes or the current state of our metabolic systems, etc) to the lamp I am using right now (instantly search and learn the history of this exact product to know if it was created Carbon neutral).  I can’t wait for stuff like that.

I am not here to rant, I am here to inspire better.

Founders: odds are you went to Stanford, have an MBA, or you came from a benefited family – and your company slings mass discount group coupons online? Why are you wasting your talent and intelligence?  I believe you are better than this.

And VC’s: that $5 million could have helped an entrepreneur who has a vision to transform your children’s’ future education?  Or maybe help lower your monthly health care costs?  Doesn’t that sound like a better future?

I honestly think these are valid questions to ask in today’s investment and entrepreneurial communities.

I am not saying I disagree with venture capital and the inherent goal of “invest X and receive a 10X return“, I understand the system has to return something and feed itself. I just hope we don’t grind ourselves into the dumbest, fattest, most uneducated, quickest to buy a 50% off dinner using our mobile device from our couch society. Because the path we are currently heading down is indeed pointing us in that direction. I hope we (investors, entrepreneurs, consumers) can see there are a hell of a lot more important areas of our society that need fixing.

I believe true entrepreneurship is about changing the world, not taking advantage of the world.  We need more entrepreneurs like Dr. Samir Qamar.  Please someone… anyone… answer my call and help turn things around. You will be forever referred to as a hero by me down the road.

Image courtesy of Flickr user Roger Smith.

She Takes it One Step Further

Noreen Seebacher does a great job of picking up the Leadership conversation where I left it the other day.  I stated the performance difference between Apple and Microsoft can be summed up with one word: Leadership.  Noreen goes into further detail here.  From her post:

But what defines a great leader — and what should companies look for in leaders of tomorrow? Apparently, it all comes down to the four Cs: Critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, and communication skills.

It’s a great follow on post.  Go head… check it out.

Are You Being Brutally Honest With Yourself?

Chris Dixon writes in a short piece on Founder/Market fit about not only aligning yourself and your strengths in the proper market but also understanding where you fall short.

Founders need to be brutally honest with themselves. Good entrepreneurs are willing to make long lists of things at which they are have no ability. I have never built a sales team. I don’t manage people well. I have no particular knowledge of what college students today want to do on the internet. I could go on and on about my deficiencies. But hopefully being aware of these things helps me focus on areas where I can make a real contribution and also allows me to recruit people that complement those deficiencies.

Most importantly, founders should realize that a startup is an endeavor that generally lasts many years. You should fit your market not only because you understand it, but because you love it — and will continue to love it as your product and market change over time.

This is so true and applies in my life.  Great entrepreneurs know where they are great and are honest about their weaknesses.  I constantly ask myself:
  • What are my strengths?
  • What is it I do better than anyone else?
  • What are the areas where I am weak?
  • In what areas do I (and my company) need help?
  • Who is strong in those areas?
  • How can I inspire them to join me?

Here is What You Can Learn in 30 Days

One month ago today, May 17th, 2011 I started this blog.  I had just quit my full time job to pursue my entrepreneurial dreams and truth be told – I had no idea what I was actually going to do.  All I knew was I did not want to have a job anymore, I wanted to build a company and change the world.  I wasn’t really sure HOW that would happen.

Previously, one of my biggest challenges was I an outsider  and found it difficult to connect with people in the technology industry.  (Or at least the opportunities to connect.)  That changed once I started my blog and writing for major publications.  This has been the craziest month of my life at the same time the most relaxing month of my life.  I joke and say “my life is pretty cool right now, I call the shots and pretty much do what I want to do each day.”

In the last 30 days I have spoken and interacted with entrepreneurs from NYC, San Francisco, Helsinki, Finland, Bangalore, India, Austria, Australia, and many other parts of the world.  After years of tying to build out my company with a small team here in Seattle, I cannot tell you how many offers and business opportunities have come my way.  I do not say this to boast, I say this so your eyes are opened to the opportunities right on the other side of the door you are staring at right now.  It is all due to me taking the leap without knowing if the parachute was actually on my back.

After a failed first attempt I am back to the drawing board with my company Loyaltize.  I am still going to build a company?  Will it be Loyaltize?  How will I do it?  What will it look like?  With whom?  All these questions I could not answer (most I still can’t).  But regardless, this has been the single best decision I have made in my life.   More doors have been opened in the last 30 days than were opened in many years living a double life.

Here is what I have learned in 30 days:

    • Fear of the unknown paralyzes most people.
    • Letting go of the past and embracing the open road will lighten your load.
    • Most people only dream of quitting their job and pursuing their dreams.
    • Pursuing your dream is only one decision away, make it and don’t look back.
    • Once I came to terms with letting go of a comfortable income, other opportunities emerged.
    • Extending your self through written words greatly enhances your influence.
    • Influence is one of the most powerful things in the world.
    • People the world round crave inspiration and want to be uplifted.
    • Great writing is in low supply and high demand.
    • Confidence will get you through the early stages and any foggy future.
    • The blog posts you think will be huge are not, and the ones you write in 20 minutes can be your most impactful.
    • The titles of blog posts directly determines the number of viewers.
    • Learning how to write a blog post and titling it correctly is great marketing education.
    • The dogma of habitual thinking can hold you back.
    • Stripping everything off and starting from scratch feels good and can free your mind for clearer thoughts.
    • When starting something new, doing it every day for 30 days really does make you better.
    • The road is wide open, very long and waiting to be taken for a ride.  If you are thinking about it, just do it.

Everything In Business is a Test

Test.  Test.  Test.

Everything in business is a test.  The good ol’ days – writing a business plan, pitching for investment, building out a product for the exact market stated in the business plan, launching the product through a large budget Launch strategy – those days are over.

As an entrepreneur, you should now consider yourself a scientist.  Your job now is to run as many tests as possible, with the least amount of expenses to find mass adoption of your product.   The tests should start in the ideation phase and shouldn’t ever end.  The single worst thing you can do now as an entrepreneurial is have one idea and do everything you can think of to bring that specific idea to market.  Start with a problem area and test ideas around it.

Test for consumer problems

What problems are present in which you can bring a solution to market?  The best businesses solve a problem consumers have (or didn’t know they had but now realize life is better with your product).  I heard the other day: You cannot just ask consumers what they want – they do not know.  But if you observe and test them, their actions will lead you to holes that need to be filled.   Inefficiencies will present themselves.  Great entrepreneurs see these inefficiencies early.

Test for Product/Market fit

tubesOnce a problem is found and a solution has been built, the real work starts.  Take it from me, your first attempt will not be the golden fit and you will have to re-align somethings.  Call it pivot, call it whatever you want… it will happen.  I don’t know why we are making such a big deal about pivoting, great entrepreneurs constantly pivot their ideas until they get the right market fit.  Ask Edison, he pivoted like 5,000 times…

Test for Business model

How to make money is the question every company must face.  I believe this is an area a startup must test early and often.  This question should never have just one answer.  Small tests on business model, payment options, advertising (I know… I know….) and other methods of creating revenue.  It’s just a test.  Do some A/B testing on a select group on users.  Release a payment option to 1% of users and see what happens.  You might just discover your next big innovation and create a new billion dollar industry.

Test for Perseverance

Ask any founder of a startup (still running) and they will have hours of talking on the subject of perseverance.  The startup experience will test you and your perseverance.  Just don’t give up.  Do anything you can think of to put off the quitting of your vision.  Read Delivering Happiness by Zappos Tony Hsieh to get an idea on Perseverance.  I had no idea they went through the hell they did with their startup.  You need to read this book if you are a founder of an early stage company not knowing if the future is bright or bleak.

Test for leadership

I laid out the importance of brand and company leadership expansively in my last post The One Thing That Separates Apple From Microsoft.  Suffice it to say I think this is the most underrated, under-talked about, overlooked but most important aspect of building out your long term brand.  You must answer he question: Why are consumers going to want to use my product?  Believe it or not, it will be due to the leadership of the company CEO.  Test your leadership skills early and often to find the right connection with general consumers.

Test for Funding

Investors don’t tell you this, but they are testing you at every stage of the game.  First time you meet them at a “social event” they are testing your IQ and your EQ (your social intelligence) to see if you are someone they would even want to take an interest in.  Next time when you meet for a pitch, they will test your concept and your perspective on the market.  When they don’t call you back, they are testing your perseverance.  When they give you money, they are testing your ability to turn X into 10X.  If you pass that test, you will most likely be able to get money from them anytime thereafter.

I could go on… but I think you get the point.  If you thought your tests were over after graduation, think again.  They only have just begun.  Embrace the test.

Image courtesy of Flickr user Canyon289

The Story of How Pandora Radio Almost Died

I love the Pandora Radio app on my iphone.  I listen to music most of the day – in my room or around the house, in my car, outside walking around – and this is possible only because of internet connected mobile devices.  Pandora Radio just recently went public on the NYSE and looks to have a strong future.  It wasn’t always so bright, this is a story of persistence and hanging on by a thread.   MG Siegler of Techcrunch had a great write-up on Pandora the day of their IPO, I think it’s so I will re-post it below.  I like it because you get a sense these founders would not give up on their vision and persevered through much trial and tribulation.

————

Pandora was founded in 2000, but it wasn’t known as “Pandora” at the time. Instead, the company was focused on their Music Genome Project, which aimed to extract the DNA from music, as it were, and find commonalities to perfect recommendations. When Conrad joined in 2004, the company was known as Savage Beast — yes, a truly awful name that invokes Savage Garden. In fact, here’s an early blog post from Conrad about Savage Beast that he probably won’t be pleased with me sharing.

When Conrad came on board, the company had just taken its first real venture capital investment (from Walden Ventures) and Joe Kennedy had just been hired as CEO. The idea was to transform the Music Genome Project from a cool piece of technology that was licensed out to the likes of Best Buy, and (our parent) AOL, among others, to a consumer-facing product. That effort began in December 2004, with design work leading up to that. By the late summer of 2005, the product was ready to go.

And here’s where things get really interesting.

“TechCrunch is a part of this,” Conrad says. “We launched, and the first Barcamp was the following Saturday. I got out of bed that morning and almost didn’t go. But at the last minute, I threw my laptop in the car and drove to Palo Alto,” he says. “By luck, Mike was in the room.”

He means, of course, Mike Arrington.

“He got up when it was over, went to a Starbucks, I think, and wrote a post about Pandora. That was the starter pistol for our early growth,” Conrad says. And thanks to the magic of the Internet, you too can see that post from August 20, 2005 right here (note the part where Arrington tries to give out invites from his personal email address, then gives up due to massive interest).

Conrad notes that TechCrunch itself was “about 45 days old” at that point. And he fondly remembers Arrington being annoyed with him that the Pandora launch wasn’t given to him as an exclusive. “At that point, he was just some blogger to me,” Conrad says with a laugh.

But that didn’t stop Conrad from showing up at Arrington’s house over the next several months for the BBQs Arrington used to host in his backyard. Conrad recalls that Pandora music streaming from his laptop would often be the musical entertainment for the evening “while we stood around his little campfire”.

From that point on, Pandora “grew at a pace that exceeded my expectations,” Conrad says noting that millions of users were coming on in just the opening years.

But then the CRB decided the royalties for this new form of radio, Internet radio, needed to be set. Conrad notes that after Pandora was live for about a year and a half, those rates were revealed — and they weren’t good. “It was economically unsound,” he says. “And it wasn’t just us that was affected; Yahoo, AOL, Microsoft, and a lot of smaller guys too.” At that point, Pandora entered into a two-year-long process of negotiating with the record labels over royalties that led to the situation described at the beginning of this post. “This was a complicated period for us,” Conrad says.

But there was also a ray of hope that emerged during this time. The App Store.

Conrad notes that when the iPhone OS 3 (remember, it wasn’t “iOS” at the time) launched in the summer of 2008 and brought the third-party-friendly App Store for the first time, everything changed. “Broadly, the smartphone category accelerated everything for us,” he says, noting that the App Store was the catalyst.

“What we’re really trying to do is re-invent radio. It was consumed everywhere, but least of all at work, and the web browser changed that,” Conrad says. “But the mobile devices took it out of the browser and out into the world,” he continues. Now over half of Pandora’s usage comes on smartphone devices, he says. And that’s incredible since Pandora had been on feature phones for about a year prior to the App Store, but it wasn’t going anywhere. With the iPhone, “the consumer expectation of what they could do with their phone changed drastically,” he says.

Conrad also points out that Nielsen had a recent study which put Pandora in the top five apps in terms of usage on major devices — iPhone, iPad, Android, Blackberry. He believes they’re the only company in the top five on each of those devices.

So the App Store helped Pandora’s mood in an otherwise bleak time. “The timelines do overlap in an interesting way,” Conrad says. But at the same time, he says that he was never too concerned for Pandora having to completely shut down. “The [royalty] rates were so irrational that we were very confident through the period that we would come to a compromise with the rights’ holders,” he says. At the same time, he credits the “incredible outpouring of support from our listeners” as the thing that really motivated Congress to start looking into the situation.

“It was frustrating that it went on for so long, but we thought rationality would prevail,” Conrad says. And even after “RIP, Good Times”, hit in late 2008, he wasn’t too worried because “we focused on the monetization of the product from the beginning.” “Other companies were behind the eight ball, but we were starting to see the rewards from that attention to revenue,” he says.

And then in the middle of 2009, the clouds broke. Pandora (and other Internet radio services) reached an agreement that would lower royalties to the point where the business could work. “Pandora is finally on safe ground with a long-term agreement for survivable royalty rates,” Conrad told us at the time.

“A real period of growth started then.” And today, Pandora has over 94 million registered users.

Story courtesy of Techcrunch

If You have a Website, You Need SkyGlue

SkyGlue is a service that helps you understand what your users are doing on your site.  It works with Google analytics and enables individual user tracking and simplifies Google Analytics event tracking. It automatically tracks links, downloads, form interaction activities, buttons and many more within your Google Analytics reports.  SkyGlue’s patents pending technology is the simplest web event tracking tool currently available on market and one that any website owner needs if they want to increase their traffic.

Eric Huang, founder of Skyglue, says the idea behind SkyGlue came with several iterations to a previous idea.  “Before our current product, our idea was to build a standalone web analytics service for user retention analysis. We developed a prototype and had some beta users. What we found out is that it is very hard to have the users spend time updating their websites to collect data.

SkyGlue is a recent graduate of the startup accelerator Founder Institute.  The FI program is a 4 month long incubator meant to help first time founders get a business established and an initial product into the market.   The process is grueling and only about half of the accepted entrants usually end up fulfilling the requirements and graduating from the Founder Institute.

After completing some market research Huang found most of the high-end web analytics solutions, like Omniture, require consultants to add tags to websites to collect detailed user activity data.  According to Huang,” Using these services is an expensive and time-consuming process.  For small to medium websites, they use Google Analytics, but they usually just use the default pageview tracking setting without tracking those high business value click events, such as form interaction, white paper downloads. If they don’t measure them, they cannot improve them.”

Our goal is to make advanced web analytics extremely simple to use and easy to maintain.  We want to help our customers gain better insights into the behavior of their online users . – Eric Huang, Founder SkyGlue

Huang notes website owners can just use Google Analytics, which is by default only measuring papgeview tracking and basic user segmentation.  But without SkyGlue, their Google Analytics data is not actionable, and thus incomplete.  Google Analytics has event tracking but needs programming APIs and code change (tagging) on all related links and buttons and other items usually needing to be completed by developers.  SkyGlue lets users easily measure high business activities and find ways for improvement all with just embeding a line of code.  The major difference between Google Analytics event tracking API and SkyGlue are shown on this chart below.

It took a while for Huang to find this specific need.  “When I was in the Founder Institute Seattle program I spoke with various mentors and my beta users and it became apparent the idea for making advanced features in Google Analytics easier to use will address a bigger market.”  Eric adds that with SlyGlue, it will also be easier for you to attract more users with spending less money.  In a sense, SkyGlue addresses the pain-point of streamlining advanced web analytics – knowing what users are actually doing on your site.

When you sit with Eric, you get a sense he knows what he is talking about.  Not surprisingly, he has a Ph.D. in computer science from Indiana University – Bloomington with a focus on distributed computing and cloud computing.  After graduating IU, Eric joined Microsoft and became the 1st developer in Azure AppFabric ServiceBus team.  He was one of the key early-stage contributors of Microsoft cloud service from incubation to V1 release.  Prior to that, Eric worked for IBM Research and SONY.

With the current version, SkyGlue can automatically detect and track most website events that are of interest to you.  Individual user activity tracking is automated as well.  They have a good list of beta users that have provided tremendously valuable feedback. SkyGlue is currently in private beta and is looking to expand their user base and will soon implement an initial business model.

It’s free for a limited time, so go here to get SkyGlue for your site.

Steve Ballmer’s Lack of Real Leadership

 This post was originally published on BusinessInsider.com.

Around 1975, Microsoft Corporation and Apple Inc. were created, kicking off what would become one of the most fascinating times in modern history.   During this period both have been significant players in the PC revolution, although recently as businesses they appear heading in opposite directions.

One is accelerating to new heights and one is stalling out like it forgot to refuel at the last gas station.  I think something abnormal is going on here and believe it’s more than the general “great products” vs “not so great products” argument.   Below is a view of the stock price of each company dating back to 1986.  Here is Microsoft:

(images courtesy of Yahoo Finance).

And below is a view of Apple, again viewed with a long lens dating back to 1986.  On thing to note is the scale on the right.

The last decade has seen Apple explode in value, culminating in them becoming the largest technology company in the world.  During the same time frame, Microsoft was dethroned by Apple and has pretty much remained stagnant.  Indeed, there is something peculiar going on here and anyone looking to build a consumer brand should listen closely.  The difference between Apple’s success and Microsoft’s lackluster performance can be summed up in one word – Leadership.  It takes more than smart employees, good technology and market dominance to deliver great financial results.   It also takes a Great Leader.

JobsSteve Jobs understands Leadership, Vision, Inspiration and Branding are vital to business success.  He gets it.  He understands how to position his Brand in the soul of a human being, amazingly interweaving his devices into peoples identity.  This is accomplished by casting a vision and allowing a tribe of followers to form around it.  He also understands: it is first about the vision and only then the resulting products can come in to reinforce the vision with the consumer.  Users of Apple products gladly follow when they realize the vision and resulting products make them feel better.

Jobs’ vision is one where the terms “Think Different”, “Beautiful Creation” and “It just Works” are used in description.  And although difficult to put into words as a consumer, you just feel it – viscerally.  It’s almost magical.   Jobs inspires with every word – not in a flakey, shallow and inauthentic manner – but a genuine manner.  I understand no one is perfect, but he definitely gets how to move people.

Steve Ballmer is flat out not an inspirational leader nor a visionary.

BallmerWith more than ten years at the helm of one of the largest companies in the world, Steve Ballmer has obviously done many things right.  One thing he cannot do is accurately describe the deeper purpose of Microsoft or any of their products.  When he tries, it doesn’t get anywhere close to touching the human soul.  He lacks the innate leadership quality of Inspiration.  He can run and jump, scream and yell, and do Monkey dances on stage all day long but this is not leadership.  Nor is it inspiration.  (Can you even imagine Steve Jobs doing this?)

Unfortunately for Ballmer, Microsoft is stuck between so many business markets it’s almost impossible to tie them together coherently to form a strong brand identity.  Without a unique purpose and vision, there is no brand identity.  The latest Microsoft slogan urges me to “Be What’s Next.”  I am not sure what that means… consumers need to be able to viscerally understand the brand and why they should be using it.  Like it or not, this responsibility rests on the leaders shoulders.  Ballmer has failed to communicate these fundamental aspects of Microsoft on a level that connects with everyday consumers.  He just doesn’t get it.

Is it any coincidence the maxim of Microsoft’s value as a company (January 2000) is pretty much the exact date Ballmer stepped into the CEO role?  And incidentally enough, the first real growth in Apple’s market cap appears not long after Steve Jobs arrives for his second coming as CEO in 1996.  The Leadership difference between these two men has made all the difference in respect to their company’s results.

Looking back at Microsoft’s stock price you can notice a time of incredible growth, back in the 90’s.  Who was the leader at this time in their history?  Iconic founder Bill Gates, an inspiring visionary in his own right was in charge at that time.  He inspired the world with the vision of “a computer on every desktop” during the emergence of the PC and Enterprise Revolutions (and thus the software running on them became a hot market).  Indeed Gates vision expanded the perspectives of all employees and rallied them to become the largest technology company in the world for many years.  But things have changed and today consumer devices are the rage.  What’s the overarching, game changing, ever growing Microsoft vision now?  I don’t see this type of world changing leadership and inspiration radiating out of Redmond any more (and I live 15 miles away).  Suffice it to say Apple saw this New World Order coming and Microsoft didn’t.

People follow leaders who embody a sense of purpose that inspires those around them.  Notice how consumers wait in lines for hours just to have a chance to own an “i-whatever”, the newest product that will touch their soul.  People give standing ovations and watch streaming online video during Steve Jobs inspiring  keynotes speeches.  All these happen for Apple because of Steve Jobs and his Leadership.  They create a mystic aurora which parlays towards the next round of  product announcements.

All this became very apparent to me recently as I observed the response to both companies announcements – Apple’s at their WWDC conference and Microsoft’s at the E3 conference.  The world huddled around their screens in anticipation of an announcement regarding Apple’s next mobile operating system, the iOS5.  In fact, there were no less than 37 individual posts covering Apple on SAI alone, Monday June 6th, the day of the announcement and.  Also 17 posts covering anything that is Apple appeared on Techcrunch.  Alternately, Microsoft’s announcements were an afterthought, an oh-by-the-way-this-happened byline with 3 posts that same day.  Succinctly put, no one really cared.

This unfortunate reality for Microsoft is directly tied back to Ballmer’s lack of Leadership, Vision and Inspiration.  People would have cared about Microsoft’s announcements had the products touched their souls with a deeper purpose.  Right now, go to Apple.com and Microsoft.com and see what I am talking about.  I am like most, finding it impossible to put a finger on exactly what it is that makes Apple… Apple.  All I can say is Steve Jobs knows something Steve Ballmer doesn’t.

Don’t get me wrong, we are talking about a great company in Microsoft, one that still does more than $60 billion in yearly revenue and employs some of the smartest and most talented people in the world.  They hold dominant positions in numerous markets.  But it pains me to write these words and acknowledge the reality of Microsoft’s future.  I am a Seattle resident and appreciate the value Microsoft has added not only to the world but specifically to Seattle.  We owe much of our regional economy to Microsoft.  They have done great things and the enterprise software ecosystem they created is quite amazing.

Yet, I see a company waning at a time when they really need to figure out their guiding purpose.  When I look at Apple, I feel secure they know where they are going.  When I glance across Lake Washington to figure out what Microsoft is doing, I am at a loss for words.  And this is scary for me.  I can only imagine what it’s like for the employees and the executives.

Lessons for us younger founders and entrepreneurs:

  • Find a deeper purpose to associate with your products and business
  • Cast your vision with simple, strong and relatable words
  • Become (or find) a leader who can connect with people and continually inspire them toward action

I don’t know who it will be but Microsoft is in desperate need of a Leader, an inspirational visionary who can turn this boat around – NOW.

Disclaimer: I have no personal connection with either Steve Jobs or Steve Ballmer and this is in no way personal towards either one of them.   My opinions are purely anecdotal and from observations as both an entrepreneur and consumer.

5 Ways to Step Up Your Game

I always enjoy sitting back and observing people, thinking about what they choose to do and what they choose not to do.  Here’s an amazing reality – there are waaaay to many distractions today.  And I think most people are actually too distracted to even notice they are being distracted.  Let me put it this way:  If you don’t put in effort to get better every day, you are going to get passed by others who are putting in this effort.  You will lose the race.

Turn off the TV

Watching TV is one of my peeves.  I just think it’s plain dumb.  There really is nothing on that is worth your time, unless you think your time is best spent voyeuring on idiots who complain about their reality/celebrity lives or just argue and swear all the time. Does watching this make you a better person?

I will just say it:  If you find yourself laying in front of the TV each night, you are getting dumber.

Television watching is a passive activity.  It has been proven watching TV does not use enough mental capacity to gain intelligence.   Honestly, I am actually scared we are getting less intelligent as a society, and a lot of it has to do with how we are spending the majority of our time each day.   If you feel you must watch (cause you are addicted) limit yourself to 30 minutes a day and then get on with doing something productive with your life.   Just turn the dang thing off.

Read

I am a voracious reader and it has flat out changed my life.  It will help you learn new things, help with word comprehension, help with writing (more on that below) make you sound smarter than you are, impress the ladies (or men) and get you hired.  Seriously, when you can answer the “what book are you currently reading” interview question with a unique and intelligent response, you will win them over.  Interestingly, the web has made this easier with all the blogs and articles you can read now, even when using your mobile device.  This has been one of my favorite innovations that have come along with the spread of the internet – information proliferation.  It is just everywhere.  And I take advantage of that to get smarter anywhere I can.

Exercise

I get my best ideas when I am exercising.  When I run, I allow my mind to run free as well, spinning ideas and thoughts out at a frantic pace.  This helps me evaluate an idea and determine if it is valid enough to take further.  I can only do this when I have 45 to an hour of “free” time to just allow the thoughts to flow in and out of consciousness.

Exercise is good for your health, but you probably know that so I am not going down that road.  Get out, get some exercise and let your mind run free as well.  It is one of the best ways to have a natural brainstorm session each day.

Be Social

Interacting with others and meeting new people is a great way to raise your stock.  How easy is it to stick to the same comfortable group of friends?  I actually think  most of us are wired that way – staying in comfort zone and only communicate with ones we are familiar with.  Well, if you are looking to progress socially as well as professionally, you need to get uncomfortable and get in front of new people.  Before you know it, they will be your new friends and you will grow your circle of influence.  And you know what, they usually know people who you need to know.

Write/Blog

I couldn’t have told you this a month ago but writing is one of the best ways to step up your game and expand your influence.  Since I have started SoEntrepreneurial and started blogging, I have connected with many different people around the world in the technology industry.   In fact, I just got off the phone with someone in Helsinki, Finland.  We had a great conversation about startups and his new venture I wrote about previously – Founder2be.

Writing and reading go hand in hand.  The more you read, the better you will become as a writer.  This is natural and will take time to come together, but here’s my advice:  get started.  And keep going.  It will open doors you never even knew existed.

It’s time to step up your game.

Image courtesy of Flickr user Roger Smith.

The Daily Deal Cuts Like a Knife

Update: this post was originally posted on BusinessInsider.com

For years now I have been waiting to read a post like the one I just read on the Daily Deals concept.  Rocky Agrawal has done extensive research on the daily deals phenomenon and succinctly puts it:  The entire daily deals industry must die.

I vehemently agree with his perspective; it finally calls out aspects of the model people have been turning a blind eye towards for way too long.  Please do yourself a favor and read it.   Although much has been written lately regarding Groupon and it’s historical rise (one in which I have no question been fascinated with), we should not forget: a good business might not be good for business.  Here are some thoughts I had back in 2008 when we first heard of Groupon and still hold today.

Discounts are for crappy businesses

BMW is a luxury car.  The Metropolitan in Seattle is a nice restaurant.  Gucci and Prada command extremely high prices for their merchandise.  Although these companies are more well known brands, I think you get the point.  They don’t have to discount their products because they don’t need to.  By building a business through offering a quality product or service (and running it soundly) they don’t need to resort to scrapping the bottom of the ocean just to sell something.

But when a business is having trouble getting people through the door they will look for any way to reverse the trend.  Some hire people to wear the sandwich board, hold the arrow and dance around on the corner for minimum wage.  Others will offer 2-fers.   And now many are realizing the power Groupon has in getting get their name in front of thousands in one day.  All this marketing does not change the fact that something is wrong with their business.  If there wasn’t anything wrong, they wouldn’t need more customers and wouldn’t be running a Groupon.  Rocky describes the core fundamentals of coupons and group discounts have been around for many years.  Only difference now is the medium used for distribution.

Discounting is like crack for business

Once a business chooses to offer their products or services for a discount – say 50% off – they have effectively started abusing a drug.  The daily deal is impulsive for consumers, as in, some experience a high when they open their daily deal email each day.  “OMG, what will it be?”   And local businesses get a excited when they see a large influx of customers (the high).  Once this initial influx dies down two things happen.  First (and most likely), their business volume will go directly back to the customer visit level previously experienced prior to offering a Groupon (the comedown).  And second, they now have told the world the “real” value of their products or services.  It would be foolish for a customer to pay full price for something once they know it will be offered for half the price.  So businesses are forced to continually slash their prices and offer more mass discount deals to maintain customer interest.  It becomes an ugly downward spiral (addiction).  This brings me to my next point…

How is 50% -75% off a sustainable economic model?

knivesGroupon (and the like) are effectively (re)training the local consumer to expect ALL products and services to be offered at a steep discount.  We are creating a consumer addicted to the mass discount.  This is not sustainable and downright scary for the local economy.

I should know, my previous business offered Health and Fitness services on a local level.  My income could be thought of on an hourly rate for the service I provided.  Given I charged $100 per hour, take away 30% for facility rent, and 20% for taxes I am left with at most $50 per hour of compensation.  If I chose to offer a daily deal discount and reduced my professional rate to $50… well I think you get the picture.  And what do you think I would have told my existing clients “oh, them…?  they bought the Groupon so they paid half as much as you for the same service.”  I would have lost all my full paying clients.

My point is profit margins are generally very low in the local economy- restaurants, health services, retail stores, coffee shops, etc… it’s not uncommon to be dealing with single digit percent profit margins.  It’s like each daily deal is a knife stab to the gut of a business.  There is no way this economic picture is sustainable and Rocky does an excellent job of describing what is going on: millions of people and thousands of business owners are being taken advantage of.  It will have to stop.

A real business is built upon Loyalty

Pareto’s law, or something known as the 80/20 rule is at the foundation of any business, any size.  To paraphrase, it says “80 percent of a businesses revenue will come from 20 percent of its customers.”  Simply put, it is loyal customers who keep a business running.  The hard fact is this phenomenon will never change and is the basis of why I started Loyaltize.  Notice how much the words Loyal and Loyalty are popping up nowadays.  I believe tremendous value will be created in the local space built around customer loyalty.

Groupon is essentially trying to swim against the natural economic current by allowing businesses to offer discounts to thousands of new customers.  Surprisingly, they sell local businesses on using their service by saying “we will help you gain more loyal customers” at the same time they promote to consumers “Groupon is a way to discover new businesses in your local community.”   Unfortunately these are contradictory statements and the truth is Groupon attracts deal seekers, not loyal customers who are willing to pay full price for a quality service.

If we are not careful, we are going to ruin our own local communities

I believe this mass group discounting cannot go on much longer.  But if I am wrong and it does we will effectively kill off what we currently consider our local communities.  Maybe it is a good time to reflect on what exactly is the “local community”.  My definition is all the local proprietors who run most of the operations you frequent throughout your normal life.  Actually, they are these things:

•    Represent 99.7 percent of all employer firms.
•    Employ half of all private sector employees.
•    Pay 44 percent of total U.S. private payroll.
•    Generated 65 percent of net new jobs over the past 17 years.
•    Create more than half of the nonfarm private GDP.
•    Hire 43 percent of high tech workers ( scientists, engineers, programmers, and others).
•    Are 52 percent home-based and 2 percent franchises.
•    Made up 97.5 percent of all identified exporters in FY 2008.
•    Produce 13 times more patents per employee than large patenting firms.

Once we all (as consumers) only seek deals on the cheap and expect to buy dinner online for $10 instead of the regular price of $25, the local community will cease to exist.  Most local businesses will not be able to operate at such levels.

Years ago, many feared Walmart and fast food was the end of local culture as we knew it. I argue Groupon, LivingSocial and all Daily Deal operators will do much more harm to all our own unique local communities than Walmart did.  Go ahead, ask any local restauranteur, barista, Health professional, or masseuse what they think about giving away their products for more than half the price.  I hope we can move on from 75% off deals and find a sustainable local advertising model before it’s too late.

Image courtesy of flickr user Parl

Graduates: Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish

Here’s to all the graduates out there who are now taking the leap into the real world.  I cannot say it better than Steve Jobs in his 2005 commencement speech to Standford University students.  This is one of the most incredible speeches I have ever heard and for you, a 15 minutes well spent.  Enjoy.